Actually, I'm not sure how much of a stretch Cars slash really represents wrt the previous establishment of Transformers slash, of which there's likely to be a huge resurgence with next year's live-action/CGI TF movie. I mean, really; the anthropomorphic forms are just aesthetic frippery compared to the underlying logistics of how/why sentient gadgets have sex (or for that matter, genders) in the first place.
But then, romantic pair-bonding is already canon for both shows, so I guess there's no real reason not to explore the associated physical dimension. Except for having one's brain go kaboomsplat 8|
If you are open to think and imagine crackfics, carslash is not so far fatched. After all, cars, if only by accident, can bumb in another cars backside. ^_-
Someone should ask Pixar just *why* the denizens of the Carsverse have tongues. Long, flexible tongues. Not that fans aren't supplying their own rationales. And illustrations.
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
ninetydegrees
no subject
on 2006-07-03 12:52 am (UTC)no subject
on 2006-07-03 01:38 am (UTC)Actually, I'm not sure how much of a stretch Cars slash really represents wrt the previous establishment of Transformers slash, of which there's likely to be a huge resurgence with next year's live-action/CGI TF movie. I mean, really; the anthropomorphic forms are just aesthetic frippery compared to the underlying logistics of how/why sentient gadgets have sex (or for that matter, genders) in the first place.
But then, romantic pair-bonding is already canon for both shows, so I guess there's no real reason not to explore the associated physical dimension. Except for having one's brain go kaboomsplat 8|
no subject
on 2006-07-03 01:29 pm (UTC)no subject
on 2006-07-03 02:00 pm (UTC)no subject
on 2006-07-04 07:13 am (UTC)no subject
on 2006-07-04 01:01 pm (UTC)